top of page

8–10 weeks

People Architecture Blueprint

A system-design engagement to formalize decision rights, operating cadence, and accountability, once constraints are clearly understood.

This work is typically engaged after an Operating Review confirms structural misalignment.

The People Architecture Blueprint is not exploratory.
 

It is used when leaders already agree on what’s broken and need to formalize decisions, roles, and operating cadence into a durable structure.
 

This work translates diagnostic insight into a system that can be run, reinforced, and held accountable without ongoing intervention.

This Solves

What You Actually Feel Day-to-Day:

  • Approvals drag for days or weeks
     

  • Managers one-off reinvent performance processes
     

  • Decisions bounce between leaders or stall in email chains.
     

  • Cross-functional priorities conflict because there’s no unified cadence

In 8–10 weeks, leaders leave with a defined structure for decisions, cadence, and accountability.

Typically engaged by:

SaaS/Tech and Professional Services

SaaS/Tech and Professional Services (150–400 FTE; post-M&A to 1,000 FTE)

Triggers:

  • A new COO or CPO inheriting unclear decision rights
     

  • Missed targets caused by approval bottlenecks
     

  • Manager layers scaling faster than operating cadence

Observed effects after system design

Decision Latency (DLI)

Observed reductions of 20%–40% following system design

Manager Operating System Adoption (MOA%)

Higher adoption following clarified roles and cadence

Employee Experience Action Velocity (EAV)

Faster closure of employee feedback actions after governance is installed

Metrics reflect downstream patterns observed across engagements, not outcomes guaranteed by the Blueprint.

What You Get

  • Operating model: decision rights, RACI, interfaces, escalation paths
     

  • Manager operating cadence: weekly huddles, 1:1 scripts, recognition, workload guardrails
     

  • Dashboards & metric definitions: scorecards for teams/leaders
     

  • Governance calendar: defining monthly/quarterly reviews and owners
     

  • Internal enablement materials for optional rollout

Assess → current operating model, spans/layers, decision baseline

Design → decision rights, interfaces, performance expectations

Document → playbooks, role clarity, and operating cadence

Define → governance forums, dashboards, and accountability owners

The Process

Engagement Scope

Core

(150–400 FTE): 8 weeks | $45k–$60k 

  • Operating model definition: decision rights, performance cycle, leadership cadence
     

  • Playbooks & system documentation
     

  • Manager OS starter set

Enterprise/Post‑M&A

(400–1,000 FTE w/ trigger): 9–10 weeks | $60k–$80k 
 

  • Multi-site system design: escalation paths and governance structure
     

  • Synergy-capture decision framework
     

  • Integration design artifacts

Add On:

→ Synergy‑capture checklist and integration comms (Post‑M&A variant).

 

Pricing varies by scope; design and documentation only. Execution remains internal or partner-led.

Teams using this blueprint cut decision latency by 20–40% within 90 days.

What system design makes possible

Outcomes 

Reduced reliance on ad-hoc decision making
 

Clear execution expectations across roles
 

More consistent manager judgment


Governance that operates without constant intervention

Measurement definitions (DLI, MOA%, EAV) and tracking methods included in the final blueprint.

Formalize how decisions & accountability operate

Decision rights, cadence, and governance, defined for sustained use.

SUCCESS ALLY Logo

© 2025 by Success Ally, LLC

bottom of page